Researchgate wikipedia search engine name removal

To create this article, 21 people, some anonymous, worked to edit and improve it over time. This article has been viewedtimes. Learn more As people become more reliant on the Internet, personal information is becoming more easily accessible.

If you've typed your name into a popular search engine, you might have been surprised to find more information out there than you anticipated. Maybe you own a business and were disappointed to find negative reviews online, or you discovered that your full name and address are available for anyone to see. While it's almost impossible to immediately wipe your name from Internet search results, there are a few things you can do to make it harder for inquiring parties to access your information.

Every day at wikiHow, we work hard to give you access to instructions and information that will help you live a better life, whether it's keeping you safer, healthier, or improving your well-being. Amid the current public health and economic crises, when the world is shifting dramatically and we are all learning and adapting to changes in daily life, people need wikiHow more than ever.

Your support helps wikiHow to create more in-depth illustrated articles and videos and to share our trusted brand of instructional content with millions of people all over the world. Please consider making a contribution to wikiHow today. Please help us continue to provide you with our trusted how-to guides and videos for free by whitelisting wikiHow on your ad blocker. Log in Facebook. No account yet? Create an account. Edit this Article. We use cookies to make wikiHow great.

By using our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Cookie Settings.

researchgate wikipedia search engine name removal

Learn why people trust wikiHow. Download Article Explore this Article parts. Tips and Warnings. Related Articles. Author Info Last Updated: June 18, Part 1 of Make your Facebook profile private. Facebook is one of the first things that will appear on a search of your name, so setting your profile private can be very effective. Your changes may take a few days to take effect. Select "Settings" and then click the "Privacy" tab on the left.

Find the "Do you want other search engines to link to your timeline? Click "Edit" and then uncheck the box. Find the "Who can see your future posts? Click "Edit" and make sure it's set to anything other than "Public".

Click the "Home" menu in the upper-left corner and select "Settings". Uncheck the "Help others discover my profile in search results" box in the "Profile" section. This will stop search engines from crawling your page. It may take several days for this change to take effect.Depending on the site's aggressiveness, it may offer for a low membership fee or the price of registering an account additional details such as past addresses, social media profiles, marital status, employment history, education, court cases such as bankruptcies, hobbies, and even a photo of where you live.

Forget the National Security Agency. Aggregator sites such as Intelius, Radaris, and PeopleFinder have data warehouses full of information about you, accessible to people without your permission, and used for purposes you know nothing about.

While these sites ostensibly provide background checks and other public services, they also simplify identity theft, stalking, and doxxing exposing personal information online to encourage harassmentwhich is both creepy and downright dangerous. Fortunately, most aggregators have an opt-out policy, so you can explicitly order them not to use your information. But for many of them—surprise! Still up for it?

Before you start, make sure you have everything you need to fulfill the request. These companies have no interest in easing opt out and tend to give you complicated, very specific instructions. Miss one step and your request may be denied. Some require filling out an internet form; others require a phone call. If they ask for an ID, after you scan or copy it, black out in Photoshop or Microsoft Paint or with a marker on paper your photograph and all identifying information except your name and address and, if available, your date of birth.

As previously noted, eventually, your deets tend to matriculate back to aggregators after you opt out. Some aggregators require a cover letter explicitly requesting an opt out along with identification.

Try the following:. But buyer beware—some are scammers looking for another way to collect your data. First, find out where your data appears. BeenVerified will send a verification email to that address. The page will then display a search tool to look for records. When you find the actual listing, it will display with a red Opt Out This Record button.

This button will not appear unless you start the search from the opt-out page. Click on the button to send a removal request. Links throughout the site instruct you to copy and paste the URL containing your information and send it to Customer Service using an online contact form. The Intelius Opt-Out online form requires that you upload a file containing a scan of your identification. Intelius also accepts notarized statements proving identity using its Notarized Identification Verification Form instead of government-issued ID.

Requests can also be faxed to or mailed to Intelius Consumer Affairs, P. BoxBellevue, WA Use your cover letter template for either method.

researchgate wikipedia search engine name removal

Removing yourself from one does not get you off the others—yes, you have to extract yourself from each one individually.VK is available in multiple languages but it is predominantly used by Russian-speakers. VK allows users to message each other publicly or privately; create groupspublic pages, and events; share and tag images, audio, and video; and play browser-based games.

As of August [update]VK had at least million accounts. According to SimilarWebVK is the 14th most visited website in the world. VKontakte was incorporated on 19 January as a Russian limited liability company. The following month, the domain name vkontakte. User registration was initially limited to within university circles exclusively by invitation, but the site still grew quickly.

In February the site reached a user base of overand was recognized as the second largest company in Russia's nascent social network market.

In the same month, the site was subjected to a severe DDoS attack, which briefly put it offline. The user base reached 1 million in Julyand 10 million in April As with most social networks, the site's core functionality is based around private messaging and sharing photos, status updates and links with friends.

VK also has tools for managing online communities and celebrity pages.

Assignment of lease proceeds money list

The site allows its users to upload, search and stream media content, such as videos and music. VK features an advanced search engine, that allows complex queries for finding friends, as well as a real-time news search. VK updated its features and design on April As of Mayaccording to Alexa Internet ranking, VK is one of the most visited websites in some Eurasian countries.

How to Remove Personal information from internet with Delete me

It is:. It was the fourth most viewed site in Ukraine until, in Maythe Ukrainian government banned the use of VK in Ukraine. As of Maythe site is available in 86 languages, while advertisements are only shown in the Russian and Ukrainian versions. Russian-speaking users can choose between the standard Russian version and two extras: a Soviet version and a Pre-Revolutionary version. Other than language tweaks e. For example, all private messages in the Soviet version have a stamp saying 'passed server censorship'.

The pre-revolutionary version uses old-style Russian orthography. Both extra versions are also ad-free.

Title of thesis meaning of name

On 29 MayMail.Any research performed at a public university, or funded by any sort of government grant, should be public domain. Has anyone ever tried to push that through in court?

It seems to me IANAL that it must be a valid argument, and it would invalidate the vast majority of the publisher's copyrights.

Help:Searching from a web browser

On top of that, the authors of an article should retain the copyright, rather than signing it over to the publishers. How did that ever get started, anyway? ResearchGate is a fine enough site, but I do wish it were not commercial. It really ought to be some sort of co-operative amongst universities. Yes, politics are being used to give grants only if they publish in the small list of certified publishers; The gouverment is giving public intelectual property to a few mafia gangs.

I agree completely. The publishers have a crappy business model. There is no reason for the public not to have free access to the results of research funded with public money. The issues is that the journals own the copyright to the version of the research that is published. They do not own copyright on the data, results, or the paper, just the layout. Also, open access is very expensive to pay for the publication. Researchers are free to put up versions of their work that are not identical to what the publishing companies release.

No one does.

Reputation management

I fully agree. Funding research with public money and then not publishing with free access or, worse, patenting the results is just one thing: Stealing the money from the public.

Many researchers have a similar opinion, and while they are forced into the greedy and stupid publishing system, you can often find a nice technical report or the like that may just have a few more typos by just by googeling the title of a paper behind a paywall. In Schapper v. Foley [openjurist. You might also want to look at the Bayh-Dole act [wikipedia.

It's about patents on inventions, not copyrights on publications, but it clearly states that people who receive government grants for their research own the intellectual property that results from the research. That might be an informative comment, but as the filing is in Germany, it is ultimately irrelevant what some court in Delaware decided 36 years ago. One reason this doesn't get pushed more, legally, is that there are a lot of other terms in the grant contracts that the universities really don't want enforced.

The IP generated under a grant is also supposed to be owned by the government and publicly available. The facilities and equipment funded under a grant are also supposed to be public property. We'll get to that fight eventually, but the university lobby is now larger than the defense contractor lobby, so that's going to be a difficult fight.

List of search engines

The kind of researcher driven co-operative websites that you're wishing for do exist. Their user interfaces are not good and they have no search engine optimization so don't show up on the first few pages when you search for something.

The simplest solution is that, if you're a scientist, you should only publish in open access journals or you should publish white papers either on something like arxiv ahead of peer review to establish copyright and an open access source before the journal publishes they hate this, but tough for them. I am a scientist, and that is what I do. I work at a small company, so I also have a marketer who formats papers nicely and makes sure our open access white papers show up high in search rankings.

Is lyric or lyrics singular or plural

My work is not publicly funded, but it's just smart to do this anyway! The EU currently pushes for this very hard, research output is to become entirely public domain and has to be made available in freely available repositories. However, local legislation of member states is behind and currently, at some places, in a limbo. France has enacted a law that essentially works against publishers in such cases, allowing researchers to make their articles available to anyone without fearing copyright infringement lawsuits.

But in countries like Portugal, the situation is currently sc.To create this article, volunteer authors worked to edit and improve it over time. This article has been viewed 10, times. Learn more Although many people want to choose Google, Bing has been trying into increase in popularity.

And when the people in the Bing department at Microsoft saw Google's popularity, they decided, perhaps we can show our users that "Bing can outdo Google in any search! Please help us continue to provide you with our trusted how-to guides and videos for free by whitelisting wikiHow on your ad blocker.

Log in Facebook.

Professional academic essay writer website uk

No account yet? Create an account. Edit this Article. We use cookies to make wikiHow great. By using our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Cookie Settings. Learn why people trust wikiHow. Download Article Explore this Article Steps.

Tips and Warnings. Related Articles. Author Info Last Updated: May 2, Think up at least five different search terms you can use to compare the two sites graphically. Perhaps think of some popular newsworthy terms or things you popularly find yourself searching.

Visit the Bing It On webpage. Locate and input your first search term into the huge search text box in the direct center of the page. If you don't know what to search for, check out some of the popular search terms that are listed below the box. These links are what are some trending topics at this moment.

researchgate wikipedia search engine name removal

Look at the resulting page. Look at the differences for visual appeal as well as content and layout of the two search pages. Make your choice. Click the "I choose the results on the left", if the search service looks better on the left than it does on the right. Click the "I choose the results on the right" if the results on the right look appealing to you. Click "I can't decide, it's a draw" 's box in the center of the screen, if you can't decide, or both look appealing.

Repeat the steps, from inputting another word into the box downward. You'll need to do this for four additional times. Look at your results. On the resulting page, the main portion of the page tells you which search engine you chose most often, along with a break-down of what each search term yielded which search engine. Include your email address to get a message when this question is answered.

The Bing It On engine will end up changing the location of the Bing search page's result.In Maythe U. The site did not host any infringing media, but American authorities said it contained indexed links to media hosted on other sites, and defined it as a "linking" website. The Southern District Court in New York charged O'Dwyer with conspiracy to commit copyright infringement and criminal infringement of copyright.

O'Dwyer's lawyer Ben Cooper opposed extradition, stating that the site acted as a mere conduit, and should be afforded the same protection given to search engines such as Google and Yahoo! On 28 Novemberit was announced that O'Dwyer had signed a deferred prosecution agreement to avoid extradition.

In return, the United States would drop all charges. Lord Thomas of Cwmgieddthe judge, called the outcome "very satisfactory", adding, "It would be very nice for everyone if this was resolved happily before Christmas".

O'Dwyer now works as an independent software consultant [5] and racing driver. The website contained indexed links for movies, television, anime, music, and documentaries.

All content visible on this site is located at 3rd party websites. TV Shack is not responsible for any content linked to or referred from these pages. As authorized by the court warrant for the domain seizure, visitors to TVShack. On 30 June U. Immigration and Customs Enforcement ICE officials seized seven domains for "violations of Federal criminal copyright infringement laws". Attorney for the Southern District of New York.

The Manhattan U. Attorney's Office alleged that the seven websites engaged in "criminal copyright infringement" and were "involved in the illegal distribution of copyrighted movies and television programs over the Internet".

TVShack was, along with five other websites, described as a "linking website", providing "access or links to other websites where pirated movies and television programs are stored". The seventh website, ZML. Within four hours of the TVShack. In late Novemberroughly five months after the initial seizure, a second operation saw a total of at least 82 domains seized by ICE. This included TVShack.

O'Dwyer was visited by UK and U. On 5 Augusta leaked memo from the Motion Picture Association of America showed the MPAA's attempts to recruit "third party surrogates" to write news stories and blog posts to back their own interests. The MPAA gave no comment on this strategic document leak. In May the U. Justice Departmentthrough the London U.

Embassy, asked for Richard O'Dwyer to be extradited to the U. The extradition request was made after the Department of Justice had filed charges against O'Dwyer for criminal copyright infringement at the Southern District Court in New York. When the extradition request was made in MayO'Dwyer spent one night in Wandsworth prison before arrangements were made for bail.

On 14 Junehe appeared before the Westminster magistrates court for a preliminary hearing regarding the extradition request. The hearing for the extradition was scheduled for 12 September.A search engine is an information retrieval software program that discovers, crawls, transforms and stores information for retrieval and presentation in response to user queries.

A search engine is a web based tool that enable user to locate information on www. A search engine normally consists of four components e. The crawler traverses a document collection, deconstructs document text, and assigns surrogates for storage in the search engine index.

Online search engines store images, link data and metadata for the document as well Within this article Vannevar urged scientists to work together to help build a body of knowledge for all mankind.

He then proposed the idea of a virtually limitless, fast, reliable, extensible, associative memory storage and retrieval system. He named this device a memex. This is the essential feature of the memex. The process of tying two items together is the important thing.

All of the documents used in the memex would be in the form of microfilm copy acquired as such or, in the case of personal records, transformed to microfilm by the machine itself.

Memex would also employ new retrieval techniques based on a new kind of associative indexing the basic idea of which is a provision whereby any item may be caused at will to select immediately and automatically another to create personal "trails" through linked documents.

The new procedures, that Bush anticipated facilitating information storage and retrieval would lead to the development of wholly new forms of encyclopedia.

Essay revise

The most important mechanism, conceived by Bush and considered as closed to the modern hypertext systems is the associative trail. It would be a way to create a new linear sequence of microfilm frames across any arbitrary sequence of microfilm frames by creating a chained sequence of links in the way just described, along with personal comments and side trails. The essential feature of the memex [is] the process of tying two items together When the user is building a trail, he names it in his code book, and taps it out on his keyboard.

Before him are the two items to be joined, projected onto adjacent viewing positions. At the bottom of each there are a number of blank code spaces, and a pointer is set to indicate one of these on each item. The user taps a single key, and the items are permanently joined Thereafter, at any time, when one of these items is in view, the other can be instantly recalled merely by tapping a button below the corresponding code space. In the article of Bush is not described any automatic search, nor any universal metadata scheme such as a standard library classification or a hypertext element set.

Instead, when the user made an entry, such as a new or annotated manuscript, or image, he was expected to index and describe it in his personal code book. Later on, by consulting his code book, the user could retrace annotated and generated entries. In his essay titled "Memex Revisited", he pointed out that the development of the digital computer, the transistor, the video, and other similar devices had heightened the feasibility of such mechanization, but costs would delay its achievements.

He was right again.


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *